(Adapted from Swami Paramarthananda’s talk)
Among the Advaitins i.e. those
who follow “Advaita darsanam”, there are two major groups. We can call the one group as ‘mystic
Advaitins’ and the other group as ‘non-mystic Advaitins’. Both the groups are essentially Advaitins
only and between them there is no difference of opinion regarding the basic
teaching and the central message of ““Brahma Sathyam; Jagan mithya; Jivo
Brahmaiva na para (Brahman is Absolute truth. The Universe is
apparent/transactional truth; Jiva is none other than Brahman”. Both, mystic Advaitins and non-mystic
Advaitins also agree that karma yoga is for ‘Chitta Suddhi’, upasana
yoga is for ‘Chitta Ekagratha’ and “jnanat eva Kaivalyam (through
knowledge only Liberation) and that too Advaita jnanam which is free from
subject-object duality, only gives liberation. Now this Advaita jnanam must be Aparoksha
jnanam, direct knowledge and not Paroksha jnanam. Both agree on this
as well i.e. Aparoksha Advaita jnanat eva muktihi. But in
defining what constitutes Aparoksha Advaita jnanam difference arises as
detailed below.
Paroksha jnanam means knowledge of something which is away from you or which is not directly accessible to you; which is remote. When we say knowledge of something which is away or remote the distance can be caused by either space or time also. Aparoksha jnanam means the knowledge of something which is not away from you or which is not remote. Reading about Mount Kailas one gains Paroksha jnanam of Mount Kailas. Going on a pilgrimage to Mount Kailas, his knowledge becomes Aparoksha jnanam, as he has now gained firsthand knowledge of Mount Kailas, being there itself. But if he had learnt from a sadhu staying in Mount Kailas itself, how it will look in winter enveloped in a blanket of snow everywhere, then his knowledge of Mount Kailas in winter is only Paroksha jnanam because his visit to Mount Kailas was in summer only.
Mystic Advaitin points out
that when one receives Advaita jnanam from the guru, he is in a state of
duality as both the guru and sishya are present as also the awareness of the
external world. So he argues that the
Advaita jnanam gained in a state of duality should be considered as Paroksha
jnanam only like the knowledge of Mount Kailas in winter gained in Mount
Kailas in summer. Therefore the student
after gaining Advaita jnanam in the state of duality should enter into Advaita
avastha and in that state Advaita jnanam coexisting with Advaita avastha
will convert Paroksha jnanam into Aparoksha jnanam. One can enter into Advaitha avastha
when the objective universe is negated and one abides in oneself as objectless
subject. This is attained in Nirvikalpa
Samadhi like state when the mind settles in self-absorption in Brahman
and becomes lost in the Reality of Brahman. This self-absorption in Brahman
oblivious to the objective universe completes the conversion of Paroksham
into Aparoksham.
Non-mystic Advaitin also
agrees with the mystic Advaitin that with the awareness of the external world, drusya
prapancha, Advaitam cannot be reached. But he argues that the negation of the
objective world can never be attained by going to any other state of
experience. Because any state of experience one goes into, whether it is
mystic or non-mystic, in that state also the drusya prapancha, the external
world will continue either in a non-perceived form or in a non-perceivable
form. Therefore, non-mystic Advaitin claims drushya nisheda, the
negation of the objective universe, is not by entering into any other state. He asserts that drushya nisheda, has to
take place only with the help of sruti pramanams, the Vedic statements
i.e. the scriptural teaching, and that alone can negate this world. Scriptures through nisheda vakhyams,
statements negating the drusya prapancha, accomplish this. We should remember that sruthi
statements only negate the material world, they do not and cannot eliminate the
material world. What is negated is the satyathvam
of the material world. That means what sruthi
negates is not the experience of the world but its satyatvam, the
reality which one’s intellect has imposed because of ignorance and error. The attribution of the reality to drusya
prapancha is an intellectual confusion problem, and this attributed satyatvam
the scriptures negate. The non-mystic Advaitin says that by
appropriate study of the Upanishads and especially the nisheda vakyams
under the guidance of a proper guru, the very teaching will eliminate the satyatvam
that one has attributed to the world. That means he will learn to look at the
universe as ‘mithya prapancha’.
Anything that is mithya
cannot be counted. Just as one does not
count his mirror image as the second person, even though he continues to see
it. And therefore non-mystic Advaitin
says the moment the world is understood clearly as mithya, counting the
world as a second thing is gone. So according
to non-mystic Advaitin even when he is receiving Advaita jnanam he is not in Dvaita
avasta but in Advaita avasta only, in spite of the perception of the
universe. And therefore the Advaita jnanam
when it is properly taught and properly absorbed is at the time of listening
itself, Advaita jnanam received in Advaita avasta and so it is Aparoksha
Advaita jnanam itself. Therefore according to non-mystic Advaitin a
separate mystic Advaita avasta, one need not enter into to convert the
absorbed jnanam into Aparoksham. No doubt he engages in Vedantic meditation, Nitidyasanam,
after receiving doubt-free knowledge through Sravanam and Mananam but that is only for internalizing the knowledge ridding it of viparitha bhavanas
arising out of past habits.
So, Karma yoga for chitta
Suddhi --> Upasana yoga for chitta
Ekagratha --> Guru
Sastra Upadesa --> special
meditation for going into advaita avastha; is the path prescribed by mystic Advaitin for
Aparoksha Advaita jnanam and Karma yoga for chitta Suddhi --> Upasana yoga for chitta Ekagratha --> Guru
Sastra Upadesa itself will give Aparoksha Advaita jnanam for non-mystic
Advaitin who internalises this jnanam through Vedantic Meditation called Nitidyasanam.
----------------------
Isn't aparoksha jnanam, with reference to advaita avastha, self-contradictory? aparoskha advaita avastha cannot be jnanam, being nirguna; hence Adi Shankaracharya titled his work 'aparoksha anubhuti'. :-D Just saying; in advaita avastha; it is irrelevant. :-D
ReplyDelete