Select verses 68 to 73
Verse 68
sadbrahmakaryam sakalam sadaiva, sanmatrametanna tato’nyadasti |
astiti yo
vakti na tasya mohah, vinirgato nidritavat prajalpaḥ ||230||
So too, the entire universe, being the effect of the Real Brahman,
is Brahman itself and nothing else. It is of the essence of That and it
cannot exist apart from That. Anyone who says it does, is still under delusion
like one talking in intense sleep.
Verse 69
brahmaivedam visvamityeva vani, srauti brutetharvanistha varistha |
tasmadetad
brahmamatram hi visvam, nadhisthanadbhinnataropitasya||231II
Brahman is
the cause and universe is the effect.
This means that universe has no independent existence apart from Brahman
and Brahman as the cause pervades the effect, universe. So for a man of
realisation, the talk of universe as a separate entity apart from Brahman,
appears as a meaningless prattle like talking in sleep. Mundakopanishad (2.2.11), which forms part of
Atharva Veda, says:
“brahmaivedamamrtam purastad brahma pascad brahma daksinatascottarenaI
adhascordhvaṃ
ca prasrtam brahmaivedam visvamidaṃ varistham II
That immortal Brahman
alone is before, that Brahman is behind, that Brahman is to the
right and left. Brahman alone pervades everything above and below; this
universe is that Supreme Brahman alone.”
Verse 70
satyam yadi syajjagadetadatmanah, anantatvahaninigamapramanata |
asatyavaditvamapisituh
syad, naitat trayam sadhu hitam mahatmanam||232II
If the universe, as it is, is
Real, the Self (Athma) would not be Infinite, the scriptures would be
false, the Lord himself would be guilty of having spoken an untruth. None of
these three is considered either desirable or beneficial by the Great Ones.
Verse 71
isvaro vastutattvajnah, na cahamm tesvavasthitah|
na
ca matsthani bhutani, ityevameva vyaciklpat ||233||
The Lord, the knower of the
Reality of all things, has expressly declared: "I do not abide in them,
and nor do beings abide in Me."
If one
says that the universe is Real, there would be following contradictions:
1)
Destruction of limitlessness of Brahman
– Brahman is All-pervading and Infinite as per Upanishads. If universe
is Real, then it would condition Brahman rendering it limited.
2)
Falsification of scriptures – The scriptures
declare that Brahman only is Real and the universe is unreal. If world is
also Real, it will amount to falsifying the scriptures.
3)
The Lord becomes a liar – The Lord is the
revealer of the truth of Upanishads. If the Upanishadic declarations are false,
it would amount to dubbing the Lord who revealed them as liar.
Great
rishis who are Brahma Jnanis will not accept the conclusions and so the
world is not Real. Further Lord Krishna, who is an avatar of Iswara,
declares in Bhagavad Gita (9-4,5);
mayaa
tatamidam sarvam jagadavyaktamoortinaa;I
matsthaani
sarvabhootaani na chaaham teshvavasthitah.II9-4II
All
this world is pervaded by Me in My unmanifest aspect; all beings exist in Me,
but I do not dwell in them
na cha
matsthaani bhootaani--- (9-5); Nor do beings exist in me (in
reality)---.
That
means universe is not independent of the Lord, but Lord is independent of the
universe. Lord establishes the mithyatva
of the universe and satyatva of Brahman through this declaration, “I am
not in them; They are not in me in reality”. Universe is only apparently Real as superimposed on Brahman and as a superimposed entity is not Real in itself. So,only Brahman is the only Reality.
Verse 72
yadi satyam bhavedvisvam, susuptavupalabhyatam |
yannopalabhyate kincid, ato’satsvapnavanmrsa ||234||
If the universe were
real, it would have been perceived even in the deep-sleep state. Since it is
not at all perceived, it must be unreal like a dream.
Verse 73
atah prthannasti jagatparatmanah, prthakpratitistu mrsa gunahivat|
aropitasyasti kimarthavatta, adhisthanamabhati tatha bhramena ||235||
Therefore, the world has no existence apart from the Supreme Self and the appearance of its separateness is false like the appearance of a snake in a rope. Can a superimposition have any real existence apart from its own substratum? Through delusion, it is the substratum itself which appears like that.
The world is perceptible to
one during the waking stage only. The
pluralistic world is no more perceived during dream state and deep sleep state.
Satyam (Reality) is that which remains unchanged in all the three
periods of “Time”, i.e. waking, dream and deep sleep. The pluralistic world
ends in dream and deep sleep state and manifests again in the waking state. Even in the waking state, where it is
available for cognition, it is not constant but undergoes change. So the world
is as real to a waker as the dream-world is to the dreamer in dream state. That
means the waking world is also unreal and is a projection of one’s mind. The world
does not have an independent existence apart from Brahman and is only a
superimposition on Brahman. Being
a superimposition, world has no separate existence from Brahman, the
substratum. Acharya gives the example of rope-snake to illustrate the
point. In dim light where a rope is
mistaken for a snake, fear lasts until a bright light reveals the truth of
rope. Same way the mistaken delusion of
world being real lasts until the guru with the help of sastra pramanam reveals
to the sishya the nature of the world as superimposition on Brahman, the
adhishtanam. The world having
dependant existence is mithya only in relation to Brahman, that
is Real, without a second.
---------------------
Very nice. Thanks.
ReplyDelete