Jagat & Jivathva mithyatvam
Verse 52
Svalpamapyantaram
krtva jivatmanparamatmanoh I
Yah santishtati
mudhathma bhayam tasyabhibhashitam II
Fear is
attributed to the ignorant one who rests after making even the slightest
distinction between Jivathma and Paramathma.
Verse 53
Yatrajnanadbhaveddvaitamitarastatra
pasyati I
Atmathvena
yada sarvam netarastatra chanvapi II
When
duality appears through ignorance, one sees another; but when everything
becomes identified with Athma, one does not perceive another even in the
least.
Verse 54
Yasminsarvani
bhutani hyatmantvena vijanatah I
Na vai
tasya bhavenmoho na cha soko'dvitiyatah II
In that
state when one realizes all as identified with the Athma, there arise
neither delusion nor sorrow, in consequence of the absence of the duality.
Verse 55
Ayamathma
hi brahmaiva sarvatmakataya sthitah I
Iti nirddharitam
srutya brhadaranyasamsthaya II
The Sruthi
in the form of Brihadaranyaka (Upanishad) has declared that this Athma,
which is the Self of all, is verily Brahman.
Sri Sankara is refuting Dvaita in the above four
verses based on Sruthi statements. Verse 52 is based on the Tatttriya
Upanishad Mantra (2-7-1) which states among other things – “yada
hyevaisha etasminnudaramantaram kurute . atha tasya bhayam bhavati (When he (the ignorant one) makes the slightest
differentiation in It (Brahman), there is fear for him)”. Fear leads to samsara and has its root
in duality and can be overcome by him alone who realizes non-duality. For such a wise person with Advaita Jnanam
there is nothing to be gained or lost and nothing to be afraid of as well.
Verse 53 gives the substance of
the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad Mantra (4-5-15). The translation of the
relevant portion of the Mantra runs as-- “For
when there is duality, as it were, then one sees another, one smells another,
one tastes another, one speaks to another, one hears another, one thinks of
another, one touches another, one knows another. But when to the knower of
Brahman everything has become the Self, then what should he see and through
what, what should he smell and through what, what should he taste and through
what, what should he speak and through what, what should he hear and through
what, what should he think and through what, what should he touch and through
what, what should he know? Through what should one know That
owing to which all this is known?”.
It means that a person sees duality in ignorance and that when he
becomes enlightened he see his Self as everything and there is no duality for
him.
Verse
54 is based on the Isavasya Upanishad Mantra 7 given below:
Yasmin sarvani bhuthani athmaivabhuth
vijanathaha I
Tatra ko mohah kah soka
ekathvamanupasyathaha II
To the
man of realization, all things have verily become the Self: what delusion, what
sorrow, can there be for him who beholds that oneness?
Verse 55 is based on the
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad Mantra (2-5-19) wherein it is stated – “Ayam Athma
Brahma sarvanubhuh (This Self, which experiences everything, is Brahman)”. The one Athma which is the Self in all
is verily the Brahman.
Verse 56
Anubhuto'pyayam
loko vyavaharakshamo'pi san I
Asadrupo
yatha svapna uttarakshanabadhatah II
This
world, though an object of our daily experience and serving all practical
purposes, is, like the dream world, of the nature of non-existence, inasmuch as
it is contradicted the next moment.
Verse 57
Svapno
jagarane'likah svapne'pi jagaro na hi I
Dvayameva
laye nasti layo'pi hyubhayorna cha II
The dream
(experience) is unreal in waking, whereas the waking (experience) is absent in
dream. Both, however, are non-existent
in deep sleep which, again, is not experienced in either.
Verse 58
Trayamevam
bhavenmithya gunatrayavinirmitam I
Asya drashta
gunatito nityo hyekaschidathmakah II
Thus all
the three states are not Real inasmuch as they are the creation of the three Gunas;
but their witness (the Reality behind them) is, beyond all Gunas,
eternal one, and is the Consciousness itself.
In the above three verses Sri Sankara is using yukthi pramana to establish the mithyathvam of anathma prapancha through avasthathraya Viveka. In verse 56 it is said that a thing cannot be called Sat (ever-existent) merely because it is experienced and has pragmatic value. The dream-world is experienced by the dreamer in dream and has practical value for the dreamer in dream but it is not Real, as it disappears in waking state. In the same way the waking world with all its relationships and transactions is not Real for one, as it is absent in dream for him. This logic is carried on in verse 57 to show the unreality of avasththraya, all the three states, which constitutes the total world of one’s experiences. The waking state experience is absent in dream and deep sleep and the dream state experience is absent in waking and deep sleep states and the Bliss of freedom from samsara temporarily enjoyed in deep sleep state is absent in waking and dream states. Verse 58 argues that all the three states are not Real as they are produced by the permutations and combinations of the three Gunas viz. Satva, Rajas and Tamas, with waking state being Satva-pradhana, dream state Rajo-pradhana and deep sleep state Tamo-pradhana and these three Gunas together constitute Maya. Further whatever is a compound must disintegrate and so subject to destruction. The world thus being a compound is subject to destruction and so cannot be Real. Further the three avasthas made up of the three Gunas, the constituents of Maya, are also mithya only like Maya i.e. available for transactions and experience but not Real. The Consciousness principle, Athma, remains as a silent witness to all the changes, unaffected by the Gunas, being Gunathitha and Nirvikara.
Verse 59
Yadvanmrdi
ghatabhrantim suktau va rajatasthitim I
Tadvadbrahmani
jivatvam viksamane na pasyati II
Just as (after the illusion has gone) one is no more
deluded to see pot in clay or silver in the mother-of-pearl so does one no more see Jiva in Brahman when
the latter is realized (as one’s Self)
Verse 60
Yatha
mrdi ghato nama kanake kundalabhidha I
Suktau hi
rajatakhyatirjivasabdastatha pare II
Just as
clay is described as a pot, gold as an ear-ring and a mother-of-pearl as silver,
so is Brahman described as Jiva.
In the above two verses Jivathva-mithyatvam is
discussed with examples. So long as a person is in ignorance, he thinks of
himself as one with a distinct individuality, Jivathva, apart from
Brahman. But with the acquisition of Athma
Jnanam he realizes his oneness with Brahman as Jiva and Jivathvam,
that portrays Jiva as apart from Brahman, appears as nothing but
an illusion like the illusion of pot apart from the clay and ear-ring apart
from gold. Pot and ear-ring are only words
necessary for transactional purposes. The all-pervading Pure Consciousness available
within the body is called Jivathma and without the body by Itself It is
called Paramathma. There is no Jiva
other than Brahman. As ring is
another name for gold itself and pot for clay so Jiva is another name
for Brahman.
Verse 61
Yathaiva
vyomni nilatvaṃ yatha niram marusthale I
Purushatvam
yatha sthanau tadvadvisvaṃ cidatmani II
Just as blueness in the sky, water in the mirage and a human figure in a post (are only illusory), so is the world in Athma (Brahman).
Verse 62
Yathaiva
sunye vetalo gandharvanaṃ puraṃ yatha I
Yathakase
dvicandratvam tadvatsatye jagatsthitih II
Just
as the appearance of a ghost in an empty place, of a castle in the sky and of a
second moon in the sky (are illusory) so is the existence of the world in Brahman.
Verse
63
Yatha
tarangakallolairjalameva sphuratyalam I
Patrarupena
tamram hi brahmandaughaistatha'tmata II
Just
as it is water that appears as ripples and waves or again it is copper that
appears in the form of a vessel, so it is Athma (Brahman) that appears
as the whole world
Verse
64
Ghaṭanamna
yatha prthvi patanamna hi tantavaḥ I
Jagannamna
chidabhati jneyaṃ tattadabhavataḥ II
Just
as it is the earth (clay) that appears under the name of a jar, or it is
threads that appear under the name of the cloth, so it is Athma (Brahman)
that appears under the name of the world. This Athma (Brahman) is to be
known by negating the names.
Sri Sankara is quoting no. of examples in the above four
verses to further illustrate Jagat mithyatvam. In verses 61 and 62 the
following examples are cited. They are
the appearance of:
1) Blueness
in the sky
2) Water
in the mirage
3) Human
figure in a post
4) Ghost in
the empty space
5) Castle
in the sky
6) Vision
of two moons in the sky
Just as the above are only illusions, so is the appearance
of the world in Brahman. Another set of examples are given in 63 and 64,
where effect which is only cause plus nama, rupa is looked upon as
different from the cause. They are
1) Ripples
and waves on water which are water only in substance.
2) Copper
vessel which is copper only in substance.
3) Jar
made of clay which is clay only in substance.
4) Cloth
made of threads that is threads only in substance.
Same way Brahman is the substance of the world and appears
as world and by negating the names and forms of the world mentally Brahman
is to be known.
No comments:
Post a Comment