Monday, 13 April 2020

‘Tvam’ pada analysis – Part 2

Vakyavritti – 4




Verse 21
Agamanme manoanyatra saampratam cha sthireekritam I
Evam yoh vetti dheevrittim ‘soham’ iti avadhaaraya. II
You should firmly think “I am That Athma that illuminates the modifications of mind like ‘My mind went elsewhere; however it has been brought to rest (attention) now.”

One is aware of the wanderings of the mind. One is aware of mind’s remoteness or distraction and the mind’s availability at any time. So if one is aware of the mind’s going and coming one must be different from the mind.  When one watches with alertness one discovers that the Self as Sakshi Chaitanyam illumines mind’s movements.  Guru is discussing the mind again as one is intimately connected to the mind and takes upon oneself the fluctuations in mind’s moods and says “I am happy”; “I am restless”; I am worried” etc, when it is really the mind that is happy, restless, worried etc.  So guru repeats the teaching again to impress the disciple that ‘Tvam’ stands for the Sachidananda Athma that is the Sakshi Chaitanyam only.

Verse 22

Svapna-jagarite suptim bhaava-abhaavau dhiyaam tathaa I
Yah vetti avikriyah saakshaat –‘soham’ iti avadhaaraya. II
You should firmly think “I am that Athma, the changeless illuminator of dream, waking and deep sleep states as well as the appearance and disappearance of the intellect’s functions”.

In the previous verse, it was explained that mind is an object of experience and one is aware of the mind’s travelling out and coming back etc. and so one is different from the mind,   Here the same idea is explained through another method,  We have got three states of experience, waking, dream and deep sleep state. In waking state mind is in the extroverted state experiencing the external world through the sense-organs; in dream state mind is in the introverted state experiencing vasana projected dream world; in deep sleep mind is in a passive state, resolved and in potential condition.  The witness of all the three states of experience and the presence and absence of thought in those states is the Sakshi Chaitanyam that is the Athma, which is oneself.  In the same way one is aware of the intellect’s functioning in the waking state and its non-functioning in the other two states.  “Sakshi Chaitanyam, the Athma, who by its mere presence illumines the three states of experience and the fluctuations of the intellect is You, the meaning of ‘Tvam’ pada”  guru tells the disciple.

Verse 23
Ghata avabhaasakoh deepoh ghataadanyao yathaa ishyate I
Dehaavabhaasakoh dehee tathaa ‘aham bodha vigrahah’ II
Just as a lamp that illumines a pot is known as different from the illumined pot so also, I,the self, an embodiment of Consciousness, being the illuminator of the body (am different from the body).

In this verse the idea that illuminator is different from the illumined object is repeated in respect of Self and body with the difference that in this verse Athma is described as embodiment Of Consciousness.  Consciousness spreads over the body intimately.  Therefore, one thinks body is a conscious entity.  This verse states that the body is not a conscious entity. Consciousness is like the light, body is like the object. One is the illuminator another is the illumined. They are not one and the same. So guru reminds the student “You, the embodiment of Consciousness is different from the body”.


Verse 24
Putra vitta-aadayoh bhaavaa yasya sheshatayaa priyaah I
Drishtaa sarvapriyatamah ‘soham’ iti avadhaaraya.II
Beings and things such as children and wealth are dear for the sake of That One who is the sole Seer and dearest of all –‘I am That One’, thus you should firmly think. 
Verse  25
Parapremaaspadatayaa  maa nabhuvamaham sadha I
Bhooyaasamiti yoh drishtaa ‘soham’ iti avadhaaraya. II
The dearest of all, for whom there is the anxiety, ‘May I never cease to be; may I always  be’, That supreme Seer –‘I am That One’, thus you should firmly think.

Athma that has been hitherto described as Chaitanya swarupam, is now described as Ananda swarupam in these two verses 24 and 25.  Love for ananda is universal and unconditional. Self-love is universal and unconditional.  Equating these two we arrive at the conclusion that ananda and Self are one and same i.e Athma, the self is Ananda swarupa.  Further love for others is conditional only, condition being that they make one happy.  In fact no one loves anyone for anyone’s sake.   As Brihadaranya Upanishad points out “athmanasthu kamaya sarvam priyam bhavathi”.  It is only for one’s own sake anything and everything else become lovable.  Even love for wife, children and wealth and other objects are conditional only.  As far as they are useful to one and connected to that one, they are loved.  Yajnavalkya in Brihadaranyaka Upanishad clearly says that love for others is conditional and only love for oneself is unconditional. “That Athma which is not only Chit swarupa but is also Ananda swarupa and that Athma is the real ‘I’”, guru instructs the disciple.
And this unconditional love for oneself is expressed in the form of a person’s desire to live on and on and on. Nobody wants to die because everything else that is dear to him, he can enjoy only if he is alive. Therefore, everybody wants to live eternally. Nobody wants mortality, everybody wants immortality.  If then one wonders why some people commit suicide it is because of self-hatread induced by debt, disease, dishonour etc.  If through some intervention, divine or human, if those conditions are removed one would no longer like to end his life.   Hatred for oneself is conditional. Love for oneself alone is unconditional.  Athma, the supreme seer of body, mind, sense-organs, intellect and prana is also Ananda swarupa and that Athma is the Real ‘I’”, guru teaches the disciple.

Verse 26

Yah saakshi-lakshanah bodhah ‘tvam’-padaarthah sah uchyate I
Saakshi-tvam api boddha-tvam avikaaritayaa aatmanah.II
Consciousness, which is of the nature of Witness, is that which is meant by the word ‘Thou’.  Even the witnessing is only the illumining power without undergoing any change, on the part of the Self.

Guru who has all along been explaining ‘Tvam’ padam relating it to the student before him, now changes track by addressing directly in terms of ‘Thou’ in Mahavakhya “That Thou are”. He says that Tvam pada lakshyartha is Consciousness that is of the nature of Sakshi, which knows without undergoing any change. Mind by itself  cannot know because it is jadam. Pure Consciousness by itself cannot be a knower, as it will not directly be involved in knowing process. It is involved indirectly through its reflection in the mind which makes the mind sentient. So mind + reflected consciousness + Consciousness mixture is the knower.  Of these the mind and reflected consciousness are subject to changes and are dependant on Consciousness for knowing.  So Consciousness, Tvam pada lakshyartha is called Sakshi, the changeless knower, while mind is called pramatha. The illumining power is called knowing and like the sun Consciousness illumines without changing.

Verse 27
Deha-indriya-manah-praana- ahamkritibhyah vilakshanah I
Projjhitaa ashesha shad-bhaava vikaarah ‘tvam’-pada aabhidhah.II
From body, senses, mind, prana and from the ego sense – totally distinct; absolutely free from the six modifications (which body undergoes); This, the Self, is the indicative meaning of the term ‘Thou’.

We have seen in the earlier verses that Athma as the supreme seer is different from the body, prana, sense-organs and anthakarana that includes mind, intellect and ego.   Here it is restated as the Tvam pada lakshyartha.  It is further stated that it is free of all the six modifications that the body is subject to.   The six modifications are; birth, phenomenal existence, growth, change, decline and death.  So Athma the Tvam pada lakshyartha is unchanging, eternal and is of Satchidananda swarupa.
-----------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment