Drik Drisya Viveka – 1
Drik-Drisya Viveka is
a Prakarana Grantha like Athma Bodha and Tattva Bodha which were dicussed
in earlier blogs. Prakarana Grantha is an explanatory
text or a supporting text written by a later day Acharya for understanding the
main source, the fundamental three works of Vedanta, Prasthana Triam,
namely the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and Brahma Sutras. But unlike Tattva Bodha
it does not deal with all the six aspects of Vedantic teaching i.e. jiva,
the individual; jagat, the world; Iswara and Creation; bandha,
the bondage; moksha, liberation; sadhana, the means by which the
jiva can travel from bondage to liberation. Drik-Drisya Viveka, is a
prakarana grantha that highlights the jiva-vichara i.e. Jiva,
bandha, moksha and sadhanas. The author of Drik-Drisya Viveka is not
clearly known. According to some people, Adhi Sankaracharya is the author while
some others say that Vidyaranya is the author. But there are quite a good
number of people who say that Vidyaranya’s guru, Bharathi Tīrtha, one of
the Sankaracharyas of the Sringeri Mutt in the 14th century is the author. Drik-Drisya Viveka is a relatively
smaller prakaraṇa grantha consisting of 46 verses. The word ‘Drik’ in the title of this text
means Seer or illuminator or experiencer; ‘Drisyam’ means Seen,
illumined or experienced object; and ‘Viveka’ means discrimination i.e.
resolving confusion in thinking leading to clear knowledge of both. Confused thinking leading to deluded
knowledge i.e. aviveka, also called moha or adhyasa which
is the cause of samsara. To attain Moksha, this confusion has to
be resolved and hence Drik-Drisya Viveka is necessary for Athma
Jnanam. This book is also called Vakya Sudha, which means
“the nectar or essence of the Mahavakyas”. With this brief introduction
we will enter into the text proper.
Verse 1
Rupam drisyam lochanam drik taddrisyam
driktu manasam ।
Drisya
dheevrittayah sakshi drik eva na tu drisyate ॥ 1॥
Form is the Seen, the eye is the Seer; that eye is the Seen, and mind is its Seer;
Athma (the Sakshi) the Seer of the thoughts in the mind is Seer alone and is
never the Seen
In the first five
verses the author is talking about the nature of the individual, Jiva, who
is a composite entity consisting of three layers of Seer and Seen. In Tattvabodha, Jiva is presented as a composite entity
consisting of three bodies, five sheaths, etc.
Here the author says that the individual consists of three types of Seers or experiencers. Of these, two are
relative Seers and the third one is the absolute one. The first Seer is the
sense-organs, represented by the ‘eye’ and the Seen, the experienced object, is
the external world represented by the ‘form’. Then the sense-organs themselves
are seen or experienced and so they become the object, and from that standpoint
the mind becomes the second Seer and the sense-organs the Seen. The mind itself is experienced or illumined by
Athma, the Sakshi Chaitanyam or Consciousness and so the mind
becomes the object of experience, and Consciousness, the Athma, becomes the Seer. This Consciousness itself cannot be objectified or seen by anything else.
Therefore consciousness is ever the Seer and never the Seen. Thus sense-organs
are both the Seer and the Seen and therefore they are relative Seers. The mind also
is both the Seer and Seen and therefore it is also a relative Seer. But Athma, the Consciousness, is ever
the Seer and never the Seen and therefore it is the absolute Seer. Thus two
relative Seers plus one absolute Seer is the individual’s composition. The
first verse is an introductory verse in which all the three Seers are
introduced and also the three relationships:
1)
Eye - Object relationship
2)
Mind – Eye relationship
3)
Athma (Sakshi) –
Mind relationship
These relationships
are explained in the later verses
Verse 2
Nilapitasthulasukshmahrasvadirghadibhedatah।
nanavidhani
rupani pasyellocanamekadha ॥ 2॥
The forms (objects
of perception) are many and varied on account of the differences like blue,
yellow, gross, subtle, short, long, etc.
The eye remaining the same sees them all.
The first Seer, eye,
representing sense-organs, is explained in this second verse. ‘Eye’
stands for all the five sense organs; eye, ear, nose, tongue and skin, and ‘Forms’ stands for all the 5 respective sense objects for each
sense organ; sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. Every sense-organ is a Seer
and the relevant sense object is the Seen.
This verse takes eye for example and analyses Seer-Seen
relationship, Eye is one and the objects
of perception are many and varied. Without undergoing any change,
remaining the same, the eye illumines all the varied sense objects. The forms,
dimensions and colors of the sense objects are many and varied but the eye, remaining
the same and single, observes all of them. Therefore while Dṛisyam is
many, Drik is one only.
Verse 3
Andhyamandyapatutvesu
netradharmesu caikadha ।
sankalpayenmanah
sotratvagadau yojyatamidam ॥ 3॥
Blindness, dullness and sharpness are the
many characteristics of the eye, but mind (being one) remaining the same knows (these
differences). The same thing applies to the ear, the skin,
etc, (i.e. whatever is perceived through them).
The second Seer mind
is discussed in this verse. Though the eye, representing sense-organs is the
perceiver (Seer) in respect of the various forms, yet it becomes the object of
perception (Seen) in its relation to the mind. This is true of other
sense-organs as well. The mind is one,
whereas there are five different sense organs which report to it. Each sense
organ can receive only the signal that it is tuned to receive. The ear can only
hear, the nose can only smell etc. From
the same sense object, all the five sense organs pick up the five signals concerning
them and send it to the mind. The mind then integrates all these signals and
forms the composite assessment of the particular object. The full information
is obtained only by the mind and so the mind is the Seer and the sense-organs
are the Seen. The
sense-organs are seen by virtue of their perceptual power in three different
levels. Total perception, total non-perception and partial perception and
partial non-perception are those three levels represented by sharpness of
vision, blindness and dullness of vision in the case of eye. The mind experiences or illumines these three
conditions of the eye without undergoing any change itself. Blindness of the eye does not make the mind
non-functional, and the dull vision does not make the mind dull. This principle can be extended to
the other four sense-organs such as ear, skin, etc as well. Here again we see the principle of the
observed being many and the observer being one i,e Drisyam is many and Drik is one.
Verse 4
Kamah sankalpasandehau sraddha asraddhe
dhrtitare ।
hrirdhirbhirityevamadin
bhasayatyekadha chitih ॥ 4॥
Consciousness,
remaining the same, illumines all the thoughts (mental states); thoughts of
desire, willingness or doubt, belief or disbelief, fortitude or its lack, modesty,
understanding, fear, and such others.
In the previous
verse, the mind was introduced as Seer 2, the relative Seer. In this verse, the
author says that the mind itself is ‘Seen’, experienced or clearly known. The
mind goes through different emotional conditions like happiness, sorrow,
jealousy, compassion, fear, etc., In addition, there are several cognition
conditions of the mind like ignorance, knowledge, partial ignorance, partial
knowledge, doubt, etc. These various conditions of the mind are known because they
are experienced by something external to the
mind. That is Consciousness, Seer 3 and mind is the Seen. Consciousness was referred to earlier as Sakshi
and it is also called Sakshi Chaitanyam or Athma as well and It
is only a witness to the conditions of mind that It illumines
without itself undergoing any change.
Sakshi's nature will be discussed in the next verse. This Seer 3 is unlike the other two Seers. It
is ever the Seer and never the Seen. It is ever the experiencer and never the
experienced for Athma is never an object of experience.
---------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment