‘Manisha’ means
conviction and ‘Panchakam’ means a collection of five. Manisha Panchakam is a work of five verses by
Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada, whom we shall refer to as Sri Sankara, in which all
the five verses end with the phrase ”Manisha mama” meaning ‘My
conviction”. This work that gives out
concisely the essence of Advaita Vedanta, starts with two preliminary
verses that contain the question, the response to which are these five verses. The incident that gave rise to this work is
stated thus in “Sankara Vijayam”, Vidyaranya’s biography of Sri Sankara. One day during his stay in Kasi, Sri Sankara
was going to the temple with his disciples after the morning bath in the river
Ganges. On the way to the temple in a narrow lane they encountered a sweeper with
his wife, the sweeper holding dogs on leash. The hunter and his wife were coming
from the opposite direction towards them.
One of the disciples told the hunter harshly to go away as he feared the
contact with the hunter, an outcaste, will pollute them, so strong was their
belief in untouchability. The hunter did not move away but posed a question in
two verses. The hunter’s question and Sri Sankara’s reply forms the work
‘Manisha Panchakam’. The hunter was no other than Lord Siva and the encounter
was apparently a ploy staged to expose and explain the incompatibility of the practice
of untouchability with the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta, to the disciples and
others.
Swami Chinmayananda
describes the incident of the outcast questioning Sri Sankara as “The Divine
Sweeper tickles the Super-Acharya with piercing satire”. In the first verse
the hunter asks as follows: “O great
Brahmin, When you say “Go, Go (Gachcha, Gachcha)”, what do you want to
move away, one body from another body or one Consciousness from another
Consciousness?” For if the reference is
to body, body being matter and impure in all cases, there can be no difference
between one body and another in the matter of purity and so there is no need to
move away. If the reference is to Consciousness, it is
not possible as one and the same Consciousness is permeating all bodies and so
one cannot move away from another. In
the second verse the hunter quotes the examples of sun and space to illustrate
that Consciousness cannot be polluted by the impurities of the matter. He points out that there is no difference
between the reflection of sun in the pure waters of Ganges and its reflection
in the putrid water of the gutter in the slum inhabited by outcasts and also
that the space in mud pot is no different from the space in a golden pot. In the same way in the Chaitanyam that
is the Real Self of all individuals and is of Satchithananda svarupam,
there is no differentiation as brahmana Chaitanyam or chandala Chaitanyam.
Sri Sankara replies
to hunter’s question in five verses, that forms the work “Manisha Pachakam”. In the first of the verses which is
illustrative of the Mahavakhya “Prajnanam Brahma” meaning
‘Consciousness is Brahman” that occurs in Aitareya Upanishad of Rig
Veda, Sri Sankara states: “If a person
has attained the firm knowledge that he is not an object of perception, but is
that pure Consciousness which shines clearly in the states of waking, dream and
deep sleep, and which, as the witness of the whole universe, dwells in all bodies
from that of the creator Brahma to that of the ant, then he is my Guru,
irrespective of whether he is an outcaste or a brahmana. This is my conviction.”
All human beings
undergo the three states of waking, dream and deep sleep. Consciousness is
present in all the three states illumining them. Waking state experience, dream experience and
the remembrance on waking, of knowing nothing in deep sleep, are all made
possible by the Consciousness only. Consciousness
with the subtle body constitutes the life force which is present in all living
things from creator Brahma to creatures like ant. Consciousness is ever the
subject and never the object. This Consciousness
is the ultimate Reality, Brahman.
Sri Sankara states that one who has realized that one’s true Self is
this Consciousness that is Brahman and not the body-mind complex is an
enlightened Jnani and that he will revere this Jnani as his Guru
irrespective of that person’s caste and creed.
In the second verse
illustrating another Mahavakhya “ Aham Brahmasmi” meaning ‘I am Brahman” occurring in
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad of Yajur Veda, Sri Sankara says: “He who has attained the firm Jnanam ‘I am
Pure Consciouness (Brahman) and this entire universe is only an expansion of the Pure Consciouness which is bliss itself,
eternal, supreme and pure and all this is only something conjured up by me
because of avidya (Maya) which is composed of the three gunas (satvam, rajas and tamas)’ is my Guru, irrespective of
whether he is an outcaste or a brahmana. This is my conviction”
In the third verse illustrating
the Advaita Mahavakkhya “Brahma Satyam; Jagan mithya; Jivo
Brahmaiva na para.” meaning ‘Brahman only is Satyam, World is only
apparently real (mithya) and Jiva is Brahman only, not
different’ Sri Sankara states: “He who has come to the definite conclusion,
under the instruction of his Guru, that the entire universe is always perishable
and only Brahman is eternal, and has burnt the past and future karmas in
the fire of knowledge through constant meditation on Brahman with a calm
and pure mind and has submitted the present body to the operation of prarabdha karma (is my Guru, irrespective of whether he is an outcaste or a brahmana).
This is my conviction.
Sri Sankara is talking here
of a jivan muktha, awaiting videha mukthi. On his attaining Athma Jnanam, sanchita
and present agami karmas were burnt away and as he has no karthruthva
bhava, he does not incur agami karma in future. Only the prarabhdha karma remains and
on its exhaustion he attains videha mukthi. Swami Paramarthananda states that this verse
is indicative of the Mahavakhya “Tat Tvam Asi” meaning
‘That thou art” occurring in Chandogya Upanishad of Sama Veda, as Guru’s
instruction is through revealing to student that he is that Brahman, the
eternal only and not the perishable body-mind complex.
Sri Sankara states in the
fourth verse, which illustrates the Mahavakhya “Ayam Athma Brahma”
meaning ‘This Athma is Brahman’ that occurs in Mandukya Upanishad
of Atharvana Veda: “The pure Consciousness that is experienced clearly within by
animals, men, and Devas as ‘I’, and by whose light the mind, senses and
body, which are all insentient, appear to be sentient is also clearly evident
within me as the witness, in and through every experience. The illuminator,
pure Consciousness, is concealed by the illumined organs, mind, senses and
body, just as the sun is covered ‘as though’ by the illumined clouds. The yogi who, with a calm mind, always
meditates on this Consciousness and is ever-contended is my Guru, (irrespective
of whether he is an outcaste or a brahmana). This is
my conviction.
Pure consciousness is
that which enlivens the mind, sense, etc., which are insentient, and making the
animals, men and Devas sentient, enabling them to function. They all experience
it as ‘I’. Though that Consciousness is evident in all, in and through every
experience as witness of presence or absence of thoughts, it is not recognised
because it is obscured by the pancha kosas. When the sun is covered ‘as
though’ by the clouds, the solar disc is not visible but the objects
illuminated by sunlight can still be seen by us. Similarly even though the illuminator, pure
Consciousness, is apparently concealed by the illumined organs, all the worldly
experiences take place with the blessings of pure Consciousness.
The fifth verse of
Sri Sankara reads as the Mahavakhya phala sthuthi and it states: “The Self, which is Brahman,
is the eternal ocean of supreme bliss. Even
the Gods like Indra enjoy only a small fraction of this Brahmananda (as Bimbananda). By meditating on the
Self with a perfectly calm mind the sage experiences fulfiiment (immersed in
this bliss). Such a sage who is immersed
in Brahmananda is no longer a Brahma Jnani but Brahman Himself. Such a person, whoever he may be, is one
whose feet are fit to be worshipped by Indra himself. This is my definite conviction.”
The Upanishads say
that the happiness experienced by all living beings, including the Devas, is
only a minute fraction of the supreme, infinite bliss of Brahman
(Brihadaranyaka, 4.3.32, Taittiriya, 2.8).
Knowing that one’s real Self is Brahman
only and not the body-mind complex is called knowing Brahman. Knowing Brahman
one becomes Brahman Himself, says Mundaka upanishad (3.2.9). Thus attaining
the knowledge that one is not the body-mind complex but Brahman only, one
becomes Brahman Himself. In fact
this is not attainment of a new state as everyone is in reality Brahman
only, even when he looks upon himself as a limited human being in bondage. Liberation is nothing but the removal of the
wrong identification with the body-mind complex by the realization of one’s
real nature as the infinite, eternal Brahman. When a rope is mistaken for a snake in dim
light and on examination with a light it is found out that it is only a rope, no
one would say that there was a snake previously and that it had gone away.
Similar is the case, when a person realizes that his true Self is not the
body-mind complex, but Brahman only, and his ignorance only is removed as
a result of sravanam, mananam, and nididhysanam..
Thus comes to an end
a powerful message from Sri Sankara that exposes the incompatibility of the
practice of untouchability with the Hindu philosophy. But unfortunately it is a
matter of regret that in spite of such powerful messages from Sri Sankara and others
like Swami Vivekananda, this blot on Hinduism is still practised in pockets
even today and is not totally eradicated.
------------------------------------
You have given a sparkling shine to a great work of wisdom of Sankara.
ReplyDeleteGreat. Thanks Rightly Adisankara is JAGATGURU
ReplyDeleteUncle can you also share the slokas in Sanskrit? I request you to consider including the key words in Sanskrit, just next to English so that we can read and pronounce it right.
ReplyDeleteGreat topic and good clarity as usual.