Sanathana dharma
i.e. Hinduism has six systems of philosophy based on Vedas, which are known as Shad-darsanas.
Each is a way of looking into the Truth.
One of them is Uttara mimamsa, also known as Vedanta, as the
philosophy is based on Upanishads, which constitute the latter part of Vedas,
i.e. Veda anta bhaga. Vedanta has three main subsects Advaita,
Visishatadvaita and Dvaita. They all base their philosophy not only
on Upanishads, but on Brahma Sutras and Bhagavad Gita as well and all these
three together are called “Prasthana Thriam”, three authoritative texts. The difference between the systems
arises due to the difference in their interpretation of the texts. Before going into a brief discussion of the
three Vedanta schools of philosophy and their treatment of Athma, let
me at the outset explain that I will be
referring in this blog, Athma,
the sentient force behind the body-mind complex, as Jeevathma and Brahman, the
Cosmic equivalent of Athma, as Paramatma. Jeevathma is what is commonly referred
to as soul in all religious literatures.
Dvaita
Dvaita is a Sanskrit word that means "duality, dualism”. The Dvaita or
"dualist" school of philosophy originated with Sri Madhvacharya who was born in Karnataka state in 13th century. Madhvacharya
called it Tattvavada and based his philosophy on Bhagavatha puranam as
well along with Prasthana Thriam.
To
Madhvacharya Lord Vishnu is the Paramathma and Paramathma is saguna
and is different from Jeevathmas, which are many, and from the
insentient objects, Jada. Paramatma is a real eternal entity that
governs and controls the universe. According to Madhvacharya there
are two orders of reality: 1. svatantra,
independent reality, which consists of Paramatma alone and 2. paratantra,
dependent reality, which consists of jeevathmas and jada. So as per Dvaita philosophy, there are
three realities Paramathma, Jeevathma and jada, one independent
and two dependant on the one independent.
“I” is
supposed to be the insentient body containing a sentient jeevathma, which is different from the
ever-powerful Paramathma, from other insentient objects that constitute the
world and also from other jeevathmas. Madhvacharya outlines
pancabheda, the five-fold difference between
1. Paramatma and Jeevathma
2. Paramathma and Jada
3. Jeevathma and jada
4. one jeevathma and another Jeevathma
5. one jada and another jada
Jeevathma can never be one with Paramathma and Moksha,
Liberation, is described as the
realization that all finite reality is essentially dependent on the Supreme Paramathma. Bhakthi yoga is the means for Liberation.
Further Jeevathmas are divided into three grades. One grade of Jeevathmas, mukthi-yogyas,
only qualify for liberation, another, nithya-samsarins, are subject to the
eternal transmigration cycle of entry
and exit in bodies while a third grade, tamo-yogyas, are condemned
to eternal hell.
So in a nutshell as per Dvaita
philosophy, Jeevathmas are many and Jeevathma is the servant of Paramatma and Jeevathma
can never claim unity with Paramatma.
Visishtadvaita
The Vishishtadvaitic thought is considered to have
existed for a long time and Ramanujacharya who accepts the Prasthana Thriam
as well as the works of Alwars as the source of authority for his philosophy is
now revered as the main proponent of Visishtadvaita philosophy. Visishtadvaita is so called because it
inculcates Advaita, oneness with Visesha, attributes. Like Dvaita, it holds Lord Vishnu as
Paramathma and He is supreme as creator and redeemer. He is saguna, with
qualities of omnipotence, omniscience and infinite love. He has no base
attributes like sorrow, mortality, and change in Him.
Ramanujacharya introduces a new concept “aprathak-siddhi”
meaning “inseparability” to define the relation between Paramathma, Jeevathmas
and Jagat. All the three are Real
but they are not separate Realities, as Jagat and Jeevathmas form part
of Paramathma as His body. Paramathma is
Angi and Jeevathmas and Jagat are His Angas. So all the three are eternal and inseparable
but not the same. The three forming one is the non-duality part and Jagat and
Jeevathmas inhering in Paramathma as attributes to a substance is the
qualification part of non-duality.
Moksha is through Bakthi and Grace of Paramathma,
that is attained through Prapatti or saranagathi to Lord.
Karma and Jnana are only means to Bhakthi. Moksha
means giving up the worldly existence and passage to Vaikuntha to remain
forever in presence of Lord Vishnu. The liberated Jeevathma attains to
the nature of Lord but does not become identical with it. The Jeevathmas are
classified in three groups :
- Nityas, or the eternally free Jeevathmas who were never in Samsara
- Muktas, or the Jeevathmas that were once in Samsara but are now free
- Baddhas, or the Jeevathmas which are still in Samsara
So in a nutshell Jeevathmas are many and part of Paramathma
but not Paramathma itself like a seed in the jackfruit which is not
jackfruit itself.
Advaita
Though there had been earlier exponents of Advaita
philosophy it is Sri Adi Sankara who perfected it and gave a finishing touch to
it. The Advaita philosophy
enunciated by him is beautifully summed up in one line “Brahma Satyam
Jagan Mithya Jivo Brahmaiva Na Aparah – Parmathma (Brahman)
alone is Real; this world is apparently Real and the Jeevatma is not different from Paramatma” Here
Mithya is the word used to describe the world.
Mithya is not false but something which appears true but on investigation
revealed as not true. For instance the blueness
of sky that you can perceive ordinarily but on investigation is revealed as not true. Same way with sunrise and sunset for sun does not really rise or
set. As Swami Paramathmananda states "Mithya object can have
experienceability, transactability and utility but has no Reality"
In my blogs on Athma and Jeeva-Iswara Ikyam, advaitic view of
Athma and its identity with Brahman have been discussed. To sum them up, Reality is Paramathma only
and everything else is manifestation of Paramathma with form and name and that
Paramathma is same as Jeevathma, in terms of the idiom used in this blog.
To revert back to the terms used in the earlier blogs; as per
Dvaita, Athmas are many and Athma is different from Brahman
that is Saguna; as per Visishtadvaita, Athmas are many and different from
Brahman that is Saguna, but they have a special relationship of Angi and Anga with the Saguna Brahman; and as per
Advaita, Athma is one and identical
with Brahman that is Nirguna, and is defined as “Existence,
Consciousness, Bliss” which is its intrinsic nature. Swami Jitadmananda while describing Swami Vivekanananda’s
practical Vedanta says “By Vedanta Vivekananda always meant all the three
schools of Vedanta; dualism ( Dvaita) leads by the process of reason to qualified
monism (Visishtadvaita) and qualified monism culminating in the same way
in Advaita. Dualism, qualified
monism and non-dualism (Advaita) are only three gradually ascending
stages of vision which unfolds themselves as one develops finer and finer
intelligence”. A jnani with advaitic vision experiences Brahman as “isness” of
his thoughts in the inner mind in meditation and as “isness” behind the many in
the outer world when interacting with the outer world involving
duality.
------------------