(I received a few queries regarding Mahavakhya, of which I made a reference in my blog "I AM THAT I AM" So by way of explanation I am publishing here my article that appeared in Medha, the annual magazine of school of Vedic Sciences, Sydney)
1) Prajnanam Brahma
–“Consciousness is Brahman”. This occurs in Aitareya
Upanishad of Rig Veda
2) Aham Brahma Asmi
– “I am Brahman”. This occurs in Brihadharanyaka Upanishad of Yajur Veda
3) Tat Tvam Asi
– “That thou Are”. This occurs in Chandogya Upanishad of Sama Veda.
4) Ayam Athma Brahma
– “This Self is Brahman”. This occurs in
Mandukya Upanishad of Atharvana Veda.
Mahavakhya
removes the misconception that Self
is different from Brahman. As Brahman
is the source of security, peace and happiness, bhedha buddhi makes one run after these searching them elsewhere and
Ikya Buddhi i.e. knowledge of
identity, makes one realize them within oneself. Abiding in this knowledge of Jiva Brahma Ikyam at all times, gives
one Jivan Mukthi, i.e. Moksha, while living. In that sense mahavakhya gives one, liberating Self
Knowledge. But we should always remember
that when Self is equated with Brahman it is like equating water in the ocean
with water in a container in the seashore on the basis that both have the same chemical formula H2O
or like equating tiny waves in the ocean with the mighty ocean itself on the
basis that both are essentially water only. It is not the individual with the upadhi of sareera triam, equated with the Brahman
with the upadhi of prapancha triam. We shall see this briefly
taking one of the mahavakhyas for
analysis, namely the updesa vakhya.
“Tat Tvam Asi” occurs in Chapter 6 of Chandogya
Upanishad, where Guru Uddalaka instructs sishya Svetaketu through examples the
nature of Brahman. The importance of
this upadesa vakhya can be seen from
the fact that it is repeated nine times in the course of the teaching. This
statement is in the form of an equation Tat=Tvam. Equating both sides is not necessary if they
are same like, 5 and 5. Again equating both sides is not possible when they are
different like, 5 and 8. Equating becomes necessary, only if they appear to be
different but, on analysis, they reveal identity like, 5+1 & 8-2. That is
what happens in this
equation Tat=Tvam, when you take the lakshyartha
for Tat and Tvam, instead of the vachyartha.
Vachyartha,
which is also called mukhya artha, is
the primary meaning and lakshyartha
is the secondary meaning. When I say I bought a banana, it means I bought the
whole fruit. But when I say I ate a
banana, it refers only to the pulp portion and not to the whole fruit with the
skin. In the first instance, we have taken the primary (literal) meaning, vachyartha, for banana i.e. the whole
fruit with skin. In the second instance we have taken the secondary (contextual)
meaning, lakshyartha, for banana i.e.
the edible portion without the inedible skin. For getting the lakshyartha in the place of vachyartha, we employ one of the three
following methods:
1) Jahallakshana – Taking the secondary meaning, excluding the primary
meaning. For example when you order takeaway coffee, and you are asked ‘any
sugar’ and you reply ‘two spoons’, coffee is given not with two spoons, but
with two spoonful sugar mixed.
2) Ajahallakshana
– Taking the secondary meaning, without sacrificing the
primary meaning. For example when you order coffee, it is served in a cup which
you have not ordered but understood.
3) Jahadajahallakshana
or Bhagatyagalakshana - Retaining certain portion of
the primary meaning i.e. primary meaning is partially included and partially
excluded as in the case of eating a banana, where only pulp portion is included
and the skin portion excluded, while understanding the statement.
We are employing one of the three methods regularly for finding lakshyartha, when the vachyartha does not fit in. Only we are doing it automatically, without our being even aware of it. In the case of the statement, Tat Tvam Asi, when we take the vachyartha of both, we cannot equate the Jiva who is mortal and has all types of limitations and Brahman who is eternal and transcends all limitations. So we go to the lakshyartha of both on the basis of sastras, which is the pramanam for all matters concerning Self and Brahman, that cannot be objectified or conceptualized. Employing bhagatyagalakshana method and taking out the unequal upadhis ie sareera triam in Jiva and prapancha triam in Brahman we are left with Consciousness on both sides of the equation and that is identical. The same is done in anubhuthi vakhya, Aham Brahma Asmi, understanding Aham as standing for the Self , which is consciousness and not as referring to the individual as such with the body mind complex. The other two mahavakhyas, Prajnanam Brahma and Ayam Athma Brahma are much more straightforward as Consciousness is Athma, as per sastras.
------------------------------